<?xml version='1.0' encoding='utf-8' ?>

<rss version='2.0' xmlns:lj='http://www.livejournal.org/rss/lj/1.0/' xmlns:atom10='http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom'>
<channel>
  <title>Xeno Queer</title>
  <link>https://zenolalia.dreamwidth.org/</link>
  <description>Xeno Queer - Dreamwidth Studios</description>
  <lastBuildDate>Sun, 03 Nov 2019 00:31:20 GMT</lastBuildDate>
  <generator>LiveJournal / Dreamwidth Studios</generator>
  <lj:journal>zenolalia</lj:journal>
  <lj:journaltype>personal</lj:journaltype>
  

<item>
  <guid isPermaLink='true'>https://zenolalia.dreamwidth.org/5695.html</guid>
  <pubDate>Sun, 03 Nov 2019 00:31:20 GMT</pubDate>
  <title>The Allowances of Art</title>
  <link>https://zenolalia.dreamwidth.org/5695.html</link>
  <description>There&apos;s a topic of conversation that has been rolling around my social media feeds, and which is extremely frustrating to me in ways that I&amp;nbsp;have trouble articulating. &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;There&apos;s this persistent notion that you &amp;quot;shouldn&apos;t&amp;quot; write about characters with identities you don&apos;t share, because you &amp;quot;can&apos;t&amp;quot; understand the nuances of their lives. Sometimes, people will say you should only write about such characters if you&apos;ve done extremely detailed amounts of research, and others will say it is utterly forbidden.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;This is endlessly frustrating to me.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;From the perspective of almost any of my myriad marginalizations, it puts people like me in a situation where no one will write for or about us except for ourselves. From the perspective of the marginalizations I don&apos;t share it, it leaves me without the ability to use my art as a way of expressing alliance and furthering equality. From the perspective of a writer, it just rings of the same censorship people are always trying to put on fiction, this time with a slightly different set of vocabulary. &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;I want to be able to read about, say, mixed race intersex people, without having to be the one who writes those stories for myself.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Basically, white/cis/hetero/men/whatever get the opportunity to be &lt;em&gt;the audience&lt;/em&gt;. The rest of us are expected to be the creators. And we are expected to create only in extremely restrictive, and even &lt;em&gt;separatist &lt;/em&gt;fashions.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;I have a hard time expressing why, exactly, this line of argument is so frustrating to me. It seems more like a conflux of little things than any one major flaw.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;But it&apos;s gettign more prominent again, and it&apos;s making me absolutely livid.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Basically, let straight white men write about queer poc so that queer poc &lt;em&gt;like myself&lt;/em&gt; can take a goddamn break.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;That&apos;s &lt;strong&gt;not&lt;/strong&gt; mutually exclusive to &amp;quot;celebrate the art of marginalized people&amp;quot; either. But this &lt;em&gt;expectation&lt;/em&gt; that marginalized people do all the hard parts...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Well.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;It smacks of, &amp;quot;if you don&apos;t like white men being the protagonists of games, go make your own game,&amp;quot; in progressive paint.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;img src=&quot;https://www.dreamwidth.org/tools/commentcount?user=zenolalia&amp;ditemid=5695&quot; width=&quot;30&quot; height=&quot;12&quot; alt=&quot;comment count unavailable&quot; style=&quot;vertical-align: middle;&quot;/&gt; comments</description>
  <comments>https://zenolalia.dreamwidth.org/5695.html</comments>
  <category>media</category>
  <category>conversations</category>
  <category>art</category>
  <category>racism</category>
  <lj:security>public</lj:security>
  <lj:reply-count>18</lj:reply-count>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>
